first, a controversial topic is to attract users to get the recommended eye foundation. The author first briefly under the first approach, we want others to reprint your article what the premise is to figure out your outward first, this article has value? This article, what is the difference between views and others, view of value lies in what place? Only the controversial view in analysis of their own unique point of view, I think this is to get users attention, reflect the core value of the article, make clear these problems, we should start from their own, such as we are doing the marketing service network company, well, your soft key difference between ordinary soft in what place? For example recently, many of my friends are in doubt, if there is no effect for the marketing forum Shanghai dragon? You can support Affirmative view can also stand on the angle of cesarean section Analysis and analysis. In a word, this topic itself is the very nature of the dispute, the key is your argument can support your point of view, as long as you talk about the reason for this view, for example, according to the Shanghai love closely reasoned and well argued administrator tools for the chain of view, analysis of the current Forum outside the chain will have no effect, what is the reason and effect? What is the reason for no good effect? As long as your arguments, argument is clear, argument is sufficient, recognized by everyone, was reproduced is affirmative, and many reproduced to their own personal blog or industry portal in this chain, the author thinks that love is required by Shanghai high value recommended chain the author thinks that the nature of the dispute sometimes tricky for software writers, their marketing skills and the optimization of thinking must be ahead of your point of view, dull Tasteless is no any marketing effect, the controversial issue is there is a certain risk, as the author itself will have a strong marketing ideas, not leading to the point of view, but the evidence is not sufficient but will be laughed at.